Foot Dom Videos review

Foot Dom Videos review | Mr. Pink's Porn Reviews
MrPinks.com review date - 04/22/2014

Overview:
To have one "under foot" means to subjugate and dominate someone for whatever reason strikes your fancy. So what if it's not a "legitimate" reason? You're the boss, aren't you? Well, at Foot Dom Videos, "you" are only the boss on some days. Other days see the reins being handed to aggressive dommes who aren't afraid of getting their hands (or in this case feet) dirty in the name of porno kink. Foot Dom Videos pairs a domme and a sub for arch-stroking, toe-sucking, heel-humping S&M videos as only a Fetish Network site can deliver. What Foot Dom Videos' tour pages lack in pornstar power they more than make up for with filth. Those doing the trampling, treading, kicking, and, yes, even choking are using their feet as weapons, not only of dominance but of seduction, too. Do I spy the letters H and D conspicuously close together? Does it look like updates are made every week? Does Foot Dom Videos charge a reasonable price for admission? Well, most of those questions could be answered in the affirmative, but Foot Dom Videos does charge a hefty price for its exclusive, original cellar-dwelling debauchery. Is a bunch of foot fondling videos really worth $39.95 a month? I, Mr. Pink, intend to find out (and have already taken off my socks), so why not tag along, twinkle toes?

Pros:
Every scene found in the Foot Dom Videos archives is an original production from the Fetish Network folks available exclusively on this here Internet website! Not only is this content exclusive, it's a rather unique mix of foot worship, foot fetishism, verbal abuse, and physical abuse (trampling, kicking, pushing and prodding, and insertion of toes into orifices). You don't see that everyday, do you?

Reaching High Definition resolutions of 1920x1080 pixels (or 1080p), Foot Dom Videos have never looked better. Although a little inconsistent, most videos look quite good in both streams and downloadable MP4 files. Photos are not present, but screencap galleries are and should be useful to some.

Mixing female-dominated and male-dominated hetero scenes with lesbian pairings just as hot, Foot Dom Videos does a good job of offering a little variety within its pretty specific niche. The women appearing here are also noteworthy: Emma Mae, Devon James, and Cassandra Cruz are arguably the biggest names, but the talent is in no short supply.

Where it was once less reliable, more chaotic, Foot Dom Videos now updates on a weekly basis. And, although the site is still quite small, the entire Fetish Network is at your disposal, all 60-odd sites from Sexual Disgrace and Missogyny to Rope Slaves, Latin Smokers, and Pantyhose Pops.

Cons:
A handheld camera should not always be waved around as if it's the lightest piece of audio-visual equipment ever invented. On occasion, Foot Dom Videos suffer a great deal from an overactive cameraman who can't seem to settle on one frame long enough for what's happening onscreen to have a strong impact on viewers. It's hard to concentrate on a particular thing when you're immediately being whisked off elsewhere.

Many of Foot Dom Videos 1080p HD videos appear to have been up-converted and remastered from Standard Definition sources. If that's not the case, I'm curious as to why they so frequently look drab and drained of color. Whatever the case, some (further?) post production tinkering could make these videos more visually appealing.

But hey, at least there are videos online! Photo fans have no such luck and are left high and dry with only screencap galleries to keep them company. Needless to say, the screencaps, pulled straight from video frames and often pixilated or obviously compressed, don't cut it.

Feeling like you've been short-changed by a porn site is no fun, especially when you've paid nearly forty bucks just to get inside. Unfortunately, Foot Dom Videos is quite small, only holding 24 scenes at writing. Updates, though now weekly, were very recently all over the fucking place. Consistent growth would be great to see, but I'm not sure how likely it is.

Conclusion:
If it weren't for the handful of other foot fetishism sites available on Fetish Network, those who hastily signed up for Foot Dom Videos would likely be disappointed. Holding only 24 scenes, this site isn't yet large enough to command much of an audience on its own. Those that do peep inside will find fairly drab 1080p HD videos, previously irregular but now weekly updates, unidentified performers, and a total lack of photo content (only screencaps). Fetish Network access to some 60-odd sites makes the nearly forty dollar monthly cost of a Foot Dom Videos membership worthwhile, but problems plaguing this site also affect others to varying degrees. It's a bummer, too, since these trampling and stomping scenes are often quite fun and a touch sillier than most S&M smut. If only there was more of them, they looked a little better, and I had the time to wait for Foot Dom Videos to grow and improve; then I'd definitely be a fan.